Askeladden Petitions for PTAB Review of Liberty Peak Ventures Patents
Askeladden filed petitions arguing two patents are invalid in view of prior art.
New York, NY, December 29, 2022 — Askeladden filed two petitions with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) requesting inter partes review of related Patents U.S. Pat. No. 7,837,100 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,905,301 Read more
Askeladden Seeks Patent Office Review of Kioba Processing Patent
Askeladden filed IPR petitions arguing the patent is invalid in view of prior art.
New York, NY, November 3, 2022 — Askeladden filed IPR petitions arguing the patent is invalid in view of prior art. Read more
PTAB Invalidates All Claims of Xylon Licensing Patent Challenged by Askeladden
Askeladden successfully challenged Claims 1-8 and 15-18 of the Patent in view of prior art.
New York, NY, August 11, 2022 — Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a Final Written Decision finding unpatentable all claims of Xylon's patent challenged by Askeladden Read more
Askeladden Challenges Validity of Lightwire’s Patent Related to Privacy Protection in Online Transactions
Seeks cancellation of all claims in view of known privacy and security technologies.
New York, NY, August 10, 2020 — Askeladden, as part of its Patent Quality Initiative, petitioned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) on Friday for inter partes review (IPR) of U.S. Patent No. 8,112,405. Read more
Askeladden Petitions for PTAB Review of Electronic Receipts Patent
Argues patent should not have been issued in view prior art.
New York, NY, August 5, 2020 — Askeladden, as part of its Patent Quality Initiative, recently filed two petitions with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) requesting inter partes review (IPR) of U.S. Patent No. 7,896,242. Read more
Askeladden Advocates for the Supreme Court to Grant the U.S. Governments Petition for Certiorari in Arthrex
Argues that Federal Circuit erred in finding the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges unconstitutional.
New York, NY, July 29, 2020 — Argues that Federal Circuit erred in finding the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges unconstitutional. Read more
Askeladden Advocates for Patent Trial and Appeal Board Consideration of Subject Matter Eligibility with Respect to Amended Claims in IPRs
Argued that considering whether amended claims are patent eligible is required.
New York, NY, October 21, 2019 — Askeladden filed an amicus brief today with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit... Read more
Askeladden Seeks PTAB Review of Biometric Identity Verification Patent
Argues that prior art renders all claims obvious.
New York, NY, May 30, 2019 — Askeladden, through its Patent Quality Initiative, filed two petitions for inter partes review (IPR) with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) challenging the validity of U.S. Patent No. 8,799,088 held by SRR Patent Holdings LLC. Read more
Askeladden Continues to Advocate for the Ability of Non-Defendant IPR Petitioners to Appeal Adverse PTAB Decisions
Submitted amicus brief in support of JTEKT’s petition for Supreme Court review
New York, NY, January 11, 2019 — Askeladden filed an amicus brief today with the United States Supreme Court in JTEKT Corp. v. GKN Automotive Ltd. advocating for the Court to review and correct the Federal Circuit’s standing jurisprudence with respect to the ability of non-defendant inter partes review (IPR) petitioners to appeal adverse decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Read more
Askeladden Advocates for Examination of All Proposed Amendments in PTAB Patent Review Proceedings
Raised patent quality concerns stemming from proposed revisions to motion to amend practice in USPTO comment letter.
New York, NY, January 4, 2019 — Askeladden submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) late last month in response to the USPTO’s request for comments on proposed changes to the motion to amend practice and procedures in patent review proceedings under the America Invents Act (AIA) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Read more